Vigilant
Just explore Start now

Payments Glossary · Risk & Compliance

VDMP and VFMP (legacy Visa programs)

Also called Visa Dispute Monitoring Program, Visa Fraud Monitoring Program

Visa's former separate dispute and fraud monitoring programs, replaced by VAMP on April 1, 2025 but still quoted in stale sales material.

What it is

Before VAMP, Visa ran two separate monitoring regimes. The Visa Dispute Monitoring Program tracked chargeback counts and dispute ratios against transaction counts. The Visa Fraud Monitoring Program separately tracked reported fraud dollars and fraud ratios. Each had its own identification tiers, its own remediation timelines, and its own escalating fee schedule, and a merchant could be in one, the other, or both. Both were replaced by the Visa Acquirer Monitoring Program effective April 1, 2025, which merged the two measurements into a single ratio combining reported fraudulent transactions and total disputes over settled card-absent transactions. This entry exists because the legacy vocabulary has not died. Processor sales decks, agent training materials, gateway documentation, and a great deal of published guidance still describe VDMP and VFMP thresholds as current. Merchants are still being told that one percent and one hundred chargebacks is the Visa standard, which is a description of a program that no longer operates. If a document you are handed in 2026 quotes VDMP or VFMP thresholds as your operative limits, that document is out of date, and it is reasonable to ask what else in it is.

Why it matters to your business

This is a credibility test you can run on anyone selling you payments. Ask which Visa monitoring program applies to your account and when it changed. Anyone who answers VDMP or VFMP in 2026 is working from material that is more than a year out of date, and the thresholds they are giving you do not describe your actual exposure. It also matters for your own records. If your internal risk policy or your gateway rules were written against the old programs, they are measuring the wrong thing. This is education, not legal advice; network program terms are contractual and change without merchant-facing notice.

Where it gets contested

The interesting fight here is not about the old programs, it is about the quality of information in the sales channel. Outdated program descriptions circulate for years because nobody in the distribution chain is responsible for retiring them. The same pattern applies to Visa's own long-stale public surcharging FAQ, which still describes a four percent cap and lists states as prohibiting surcharging where courts have since held otherwise. The merchant-side consequence is real. A merchant managing to a retired one percent threshold under a program that no longer exists may be comfortably compliant on paper and simultaneously above the operative VAMP measurement, because the new formula counts fraud reports the old dispute program never touched. What remains unresolved is any mechanism for correcting this. Networks publish bulletins to members, not merchants. The information reaches small businesses through agents, and the accuracy of that last hop is unregulated.

How to check it yourself

Search any payments proposal or risk policy you have on file for the terms VDMP and VFMP. If they appear as current requirements, the document predates April 1, 2025 and should be re-verified before you rely on any number in it.

Receipts

Claims above that are checkable, with where to check them. Published so you do not have to take anyone's word for it.