Vigilant
Just explore Start now

Payments Glossary · Risk & Compliance

MATCH List (Terminated Merchant File)

Also called MATCH, TMF, Terminated Merchant File, Member Alert to Control High-Risk Merchants

Mastercard's database of merchants terminated for cause, queried by acquirers at underwriting, with a standard five-year listing.

What it is

MATCH stands for Member Alert to Control High-Risk Merchants, and it is still widely called the Terminated Merchant File. It is a Mastercard-operated database in which acquirers list merchants, and the principals of those merchants, that they terminated for cause. Acquirers query it during underwriting on both the business and every owner. Three facts govern everything about it. First, only the entity that listed the merchant can remove the listing. Mastercard cannot, and a new acquirer cannot. Second, the standard listing duration is five years. Third, a listing is not a finding by any court or regulator; it is one acquirer's characterization of why it terminated an account. Reported reason codes include 01 account data compromise, 02 common point of purchase, 03 money laundering, 04 excessive chargebacks, 05 excessive fraud, 07 fraud conviction, 08 questionable merchant audit program, 09 bankruptcy, liquidation or insolvency, 10 violation of standards, 11 merchant collusion, 12 PCI DSS non-compliance, 13 illegal transactions, and 14 identity theft. Code 12 is reported to be removable on achieving PCI compliance, and code 14 with adequate identity theft documentation. The remainder generally run the clock. A MATCH listing does not make you unboardable everywhere. Specialty high-risk acquirers will consider listed merchants, at high-risk pricing, with reserves. It does make ordinary boarding very difficult for five years.

Why it matters to your business

If you have ever had a merchant account closed by the processor rather than by you, find out whether you were listed before you apply anywhere else. Applying blind and being discovered is a much worse position than disclosing up front with your explanation prepared. If you are listed and someone promises removal for a fee, be careful. Only the listing acquirer can remove it, so any credible effort starts with contacting them and understanding the reason code. This is education, not legal advice. MATCH disputes are genuinely legal matters and a payments attorney is the right call, not a payments salesperson.

Where it gets contested

The core objection is due process. A merchant can be listed without notice, by a party with a financial interest in the termination, under a reason code the merchant never sees, and the only party who can undo it is the party that did it. Erroneous listings happen, which is why payments attorneys market MATCH removal as a practice area, but the remedy is negotiation or litigation with the listing acquirer, not an appeal to a neutral body. An entire cottage industry sells MATCH removal. Some of it is legitimate legal work against a listing that was factually wrong. Much of it is selling either the passage of time or a demand letter the listing acquirer will ignore. Nobody can guarantee removal, and any firm that guarantees it should be treated accordingly. The gray area for merchants is disclosure at boarding. A merchant who does not volunteer a prior termination and gets discovered in the MATCH query looks like a concealment problem rather than a risk problem, which is worse. Volunteering it, with documentation, is consistently the better play.

How to check it yourself

Ask your prospective acquirer to run a MATCH inquiry as part of pre-qualification and to tell you the result and the reason code. You cannot query the database yourself; the acquirer can, and a straight answer at that stage saves you months.

Receipts

Claims above that are checkable, with where to check them. Published so you do not have to take anyone's word for it.